On Mon, 2010-05-17 at 13:32 -0400, Michael Di Domenico wrote: > it wouldn't appear so, guess i should have checked that. sorry... i'm > little baffled how they can claim it supports ofed 1.4.2 on a > 2.6.18-146.11.1 kernel if ofed doesn't support a 2.6.18-164.11.1... > but i digress, that questions for another list...
Indeed, it is, so any followups should be CC'd to [email protected] and should likely drop the linux-rdma list. Anyone interested in following, can subscribe to lustre-discuss. But to address the confusion regarding 2.6.18-164.11.1 and the statement of support for OFED 1.4.2 in the Lustre release notes, the list of supported OFED releases and supported vendor kernels is not intended to be a complete and exhaustive matrix. We can of course, only provide support where there is upstream support (i.e. intersection). I have Bcc'd our release manager to have some verbage to that extent (i.e. that the matrix is not complete) to our future release notes. Cheers, b.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
