On Wed, Jun 2, 2010 at 12:00 PM, Sasha Khapyorsky <[email protected]> wrote: > On 11:36 Wed 02 Jun , Hal Rosenstock wrote: >> >> I'm saying that I think the approach proposed in the original patch is >> better as it doesn't waste CPU although it's more complex. > > How do you see this, the code is almost equivalent in vl15_poller()?
It's been so long I misremembered :-( I had mistakenly thought there were two ranges/timeouts in use in the original patch. -- Hal > > Sasha > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
