On 06/04/10 00:39, Roland Dreier wrote:
  >  Since Tetsuo's patch already got merged, now this is the missing part
  >  for local port reservation.
  >
  >  Cc: Roland Dreier<[email protected]>
  >  Cc: Tetsuo Handa<[email protected]>
  >  Signed-off-by: WANG Cong<[email protected]>
  >
  >  ---
  >  diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/core/cma.c b/drivers/infiniband/core/cma.c
  >  index b930b81..7b89bab 100644
  >  --- a/drivers/infiniband/core/cma.c
  >  +++ b/drivers/infiniband/core/cma.c
  >  @@ -1978,6 +1978,7 @@ static int cma_alloc_any_port(struct idr *ps, struct 
rdma_id_private *id_priv)
  >          rover = net_random() % remaining + low;
  >   retry:
  >          if (last_used_port != rover&&
  >  +           !inet_is_reserved_local_port(rover)&&
  >          !idr_find(ps, (unsigned short) rover)) {
  >                  int ret = cma_alloc_port(ps, id_priv, rover);
  >                  /*

Should this inet_is_reserved_local_port() test apply to all the "port
spaces" that this code is handling?  I honestly am ignorant of the
intended semantics of the new local_reserved_ports stuff, hence my question.


Yes, but I only found this case, is there any else?

Thanks!
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to