On Mon, Jun 7, 2010 at 4:29 PM, Or Gerlitz <[email protected]> wrote: > Eli Cohen wrote: >> counter should work as regular in upstream kernel patches for IB link layer. > > okay good, can you validate that? basically, I can set some time to clone > Roland's tree > and use the iboe branch as a basis for testing that the IB stack is live and > kicking as it used to be before the patches. I just need an updated copy of > the rest of the patch set (Roland has three patches so far) for that end. > Over the review process there were bunch of comments but no new posting, how > are you planning to proceed in the review/merge process? > Why are you asking me to validate that? Did you actually encounter a problem with this?
I did not send any patches since I am not sure how would Roland would like to handle these changes. There have been a few comments, and there are some fixes that I pushed to OFED. Roland, would you like me to send the patches against the iboe branch? >> for IBoE, they will not work since the SMA does not support them >> I have patches that allow to show counters using sysfs > > I am not with you. The counters are read using a MAD sent to the firmware PMA > (QP #1), > this applies for both perfquery and sysfs, isn't it? The counters patches will divert the code: for iboe it will not issue a MAD to the firmware. It will use another command. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
