On 10:00 Tue 06 Jul , Roland Dreier wrote: > > Seems that anyone who cared could already easily write a tiny shim in C > and then write the rest of their plugin in C++. Or are there deeper > issues than names of methods?
I think that it is likely deeper. For instance if C++ stuff will use OpenSM structures, functions, include files, etc.. So this will automatically will add some limitations for using normal C in OpenSM core code. I highly suspect that all those "requirements" are resulted by using C++ in some third party's *proprietary* plugs. Which is fine in general, but completely unrelated to OpenSM development - I don't think that we should care. Sasha -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
