Sasha Khapyorsky wrote: > On 09:45 Tue 24 Aug , Hal Rosenstock wrote: >>> What about the flag? do we still need it if we pass the output after the >>> comment? >> I wouldn't think so. I also think we've made commentary changes to the >> ibnetdiscover output format like this before. If we wanted to be >> absolutely sure it wouldn't break anything, we'd keep the flag though. >> It's up to Sasha. > > The '-f' flag could make sense since those information actually > duplicates previous 4xDDR, etc. and used by ibsim's parser only. > > Also it would be nice to make ibsim's parser to understand both > possibilities: s=2 and speed=2 (Or even to parse "*x*DR" strings :))
Is it valid to assume that "*x*DR" string is always the last token? If so, the patch should be changed Eli > > Sasha > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in > the body of a message to [email protected] > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
