> > Just curious -- what's up with this change here? Is this connected to > > IBoE support, or is this an independent fix? > > It is required for proper distribution of IBoE multicast packets while > still not hurting the mlx4_en driver's operation.
OK, I split this into a separate patch for clarity. > > Finally this patch would have been easier to review without extraneous > > whitespace noise like > > Sorry about that. I pass them through checkpatch but this must have > been hiden within the "line over ..." messages. It's not a checkpatch issue. It's just that you made random formatting changes to parts of the code that weren't otherwise touched. > Roland, would you like me to send patches 8-12 again with this fixed? I think I can still handle it. However I notice one other thing that looks like a bug. You add a function that starts: int mlx4_ib_resolve_grh(struct mlx4_ib_dev *dev, const struct ib_ah_attr *ah_attr, u8 *mac, int *is_mcast, u8 port) { struct mlx4_ib_iboe *iboe = &dev->iboe; struct in6_addr in6; *is_mcast = 0; spin_lock(&iboe->lock); which is called from create_iboe_ah() which is called from mlx4_ib_create_ah(), which can be called from both interrupt and process context. So as far as I can tell, this spin_lock() needs to actually do spin_lock_irqsave()? - R. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html