Will send those too. The idea is to let kernel consumers enjoy the improvements 
to latency that blue flame gives. And yes, SDP is motivating us but I am going 
to push to IPoIB too.
I want to take the opportunity that you raised the issue to hear others opinion 
about changing the bitmap allocator maintain an "avail" variable that will 
count the number of available UARs. I want to use this to limit the number of 
UARs that a kernel consumer can allocate so that there will always be some 
available for userspace such that we will never fail ibv_devinfo due to lack of 
UARs. Thoughts?

-----Original Message-----
From: Or Gerlitz [mailto:[email protected]] 
Sent: Monday, November 08, 2010 9:51 AM
To: Eli Cohen
Cc: Roland Dreier; linux-rdma
Subject: Re: Fix IPoIB to conform to ethtool definitions

Eli Cohen wrote:
> Sure, I was going to. I will send later today.

I saw that you've dropped and implementation of inline/blue-flame sending 
for kernel space, what was the motivation is it sdp, rds or alike or something 
else?

Or.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to