On Fri, 11 Feb 2011, Hefty, Sean wrote: > > Ok, someone needs to double check me on this before merging anything, but > > don't we want to allocate sizeof(struct ib_mad_snoop_private) here, rather > > than just the size of a pointer to the struct? > > new_snoop_table is declared as: > > struct ib_mad_snoop_private **new_snoop_table; > > It should point to an array of pointers. > Ok. Thank you for that reply. Just ignore the patch then.
-- Jesper Juhl <[email protected]> http://www.chaosbits.net/ Plain text mails only, please. Don't top-post http://www.catb.org/~esr/jargon/html/T/top-post.html -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
