On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 6:40 PM, Jason Gunthorpe <[email protected]> wrote: > [ ... ] > Like any other non-portable construct using it or not depends on what > you are trying to accomplish and how much performance you gain. But in > any event, having the information is better for diagnostics so I think > the patch should be applied :)
Even if your patch would be applied, in portable code it wouldn't be possible to make any assumptions about the validity of the opcode and qp_num fields in error completions for a long time. Which is unfortunate. Bart. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
