On Mon, 11 Apr 2011 08:05:18 -0700
Hal Rosenstock <[email protected]> wrote:

> On Sat, Apr 9, 2011 at 11:22 AM, Hal Rosenstock <[email protected]> 
> wrote:
> >
> > where xxx is smp and pma. This is a cosmetic change based on
> > IBA 1.2.1 vol 1 p.725 line 9:
> >
> > When constructing a response MAD that contains all or part of
> > the corresponding request MAD, it is acceptable to include the
> > contents of reserved fields in the request MAD in the response
> > MAD without regard to their content. That is, such fields need not
> > be set to zero in the response MAD.
> 
> This patch stands on it's own and should've been just [PATCH] and not
> [PATCH 4/4]. It was my mistake when I generated/sent these patches.

No problem.

Thanks applied,
Ira

> 
> -- Hal
> 
> > Signed-off-by: Aviad Yehezkel <[email protected]>
> > Signed-off-by: Hal Rosenstock <[email protected]>


-- 
Ira Weiny
Math Programmer/Computer Scientist
Lawrence Livermore National Lab
925-423-8008
[email protected]
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to