On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 10:30 AM, Hefty, Sean <[email protected]> wrote: >> As long as the version number in the ibv_context is increasing and not >> branching then I think it is OK. 0 = what we have now. 1 = + XRC, 2 = >> +XRC+ummunotify, etc. Drivers 0 out the function pointers they do not >> support. > > I was thinking more along this line, but I can see how using a named > extension could be useful for OFED or vendor specific extensions that aren't > part of the upstream libibverbs. (Whether _that_ is useful is another > matter, but it seems to be the world that we're in anyway.) >
Exactly... we seem to be in a world of branches, and I do think that decoupling independent extensions is better for everyone. - R. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
