With lash+mesh redsky required 6-7 VLs to wire up without deadlocks. I think
that Jim's version uses 8 SLs but only 2VLs to work.
If someone was using a torus and also wanted to support QOS and also wanted
to separate multicast and management on a separate VL to be absolutely sure
that there is no possibility of a deadlock you might end up with #QOS * 2 +
1 which would be 5 using the current algorithm.

-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Roland Dreier
Sent: Wednesday, May 25, 2011 4:28 PM
To: Or Gerlitz
Cc: Or Gerlitz; linux-rdma; Vladimir Sokolovsky
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mlx4: allow for 4K mtu configuration of IB ports

On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 2:05 PM, Or Gerlitz <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Does anyone really care about max VL cap with 2K MTU?
>
> I'm not with you... can you elaborate a little further here? the 
> current HW generation support four VLs with 4k mtu, newer HW might 
> support more.

I mean is there anyone who really uses >4 VLs?  Presumably the HW designers
didn't think so, because they limited HW to 4 VLs with 4K MTU.

At least can we make this a runtime thing?  If we're able to set a port as
IB vs ethernet then # of VLs seems like it should be doable too.

And 4K MTU should probably be the default, since almost all users want 4K
MTU vs. caring about VLs.  (Probably 99% of IB users never set SL of
anything)

 - R.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in the
body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at
http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to