On 7/6/2011 2:15 PM, Jason Gunthorpe wrote: > On Wed, Jul 06, 2011 at 10:50:46AM -0700, Roland Dreier wrote: >> On Wed, Jul 6, 2011 at 9:57 AM, Hal Rosenstock <[email protected]> >> wrote: >>> I can rereview the patch intoto if this is needed. > >> If you wouldn't mind, that would be great. I would like to get a >> solution for qib in the tree but as I said I don't like stealing >> reserved bits, and I'm not confident I know the tradeoffs here. > > It isn't just using a reserved bit in the cap mask, it is using a > reserved PM attribute ID as well (C16-2.1.2),
Indeed. > and there is no way around that.. > > Vendor specific stuff must be placed into a vendor specific class and > not put into the classes controlled by IBA. Either that or modify that compliance to allow for (optional) vendor specific attributes in the PerfMgt class as is already done for the SM class. -- Hal > Jason > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
