I am currently reviewing/cleaning up our CMA LAP patches for submission.

I have several questions regarding the file cma.c, which I would like you to 
clarify for me.

1. In procedure cma_ib_listen (and elsewhere), if the call to ib_create_cm_id 
fails,
   id_priv->cm_id.ib is left with the (non-zero) error value instead of NULL.
   However, if there is a failure later in the procedure, you set 
id_priv->cm_id.ib to NULL.

   Is there a reason for this difference in behavior? 
   (code snippet from current code is below)
        int cma_ib_listen(struct rdma_id_

                id_priv->cm_id.ib = ib_create_cm_id(id_priv->id.device, 
cma_req_handler,
                                                    id_priv);
                if (IS_ERR(id_priv->cm_id.ib))
                        return PTR_ERR(id_priv->cm_id.ib);

                ....
                if (ret) {
                        ib_destroy_cm_id(id_priv->cm_id.ib);
                        id_priv->cm_id.ib = NULL;
                }

   
2. procedure cma_has_cm_dev looks as follows:

        static int cma_has_cm_dev(struct rdma_id_private *id_priv)
        {
                return (id_priv->id.device && id_priv->cm_id.ib);
        }

   Shouldn't the line be:
                return (id_priv->id.device && id_priv->cm_id.ib &&
                        !IS_ERR(id_priv->cm_id.ib));

3. There are several places where the value of id_priv->cm_id.ib
   is checked to be not NULL.

   Wouldn't it be better to call cma_has_cm_dev in these places
   (when cma_has_cm_dev has been fixed, as I suggested in 2 above).
                
Please consider the patch below as a starting point (I did not touch the iwarp 
code).
Please let me know (ASAP) what you think.
(I still leave a window here where id_priv->cm_id.ib is ERR. Is this a problem?
 Would it be better to use a local variable instead of id_priv->cm_id.ib, and
 only assign to id_priv->cm_id.ib when all the error checks have passed?
 This would leave a window where a successful cm_id creation is not immediately 
assigned
 to the CMA object -- would this be a problem?).

Thanks!

-Jack
====================================================================
--- cma.c       2011-07-13 09:54:09.000000000 +0300
+++ cma_fixed.c 2011-07-14 10:51:23.000000000 +0300
@@ -424,7 +424,8 @@ static int cma_disable_callback(struct r
 
 static int cma_has_cm_dev(struct rdma_id_private *id_priv)
 {
-       return (id_priv->id.device && id_priv->cm_id.ib);
+       return (id_priv->id.device && id_priv->cm_id.ib &&
+               !IS_ERR(id_priv->cm_id.ib));
 }
 
 struct rdma_cm_id *rdma_create_id(rdma_cm_event_handler event_handler,
@@ -658,7 +659,7 @@ int rdma_init_qp_attr(struct rdma_cm_id 
        id_priv = container_of(id, struct rdma_id_private, id);
        switch (rdma_node_get_transport(id_priv->id.device->node_type)) {
        case RDMA_TRANSPORT_IB:
-               if (!id_priv->cm_id.ib || cma_is_ud_ps(id_priv->id.ps))
+               if (!cma_has_cm_dev(id_priv) || cma_is_ud_ps(id_priv->id.ps))
                        ret = cma_ib_init_qp_attr(id_priv, qp_attr, 
qp_attr_mask);
                else
                        ret = ib_cm_init_qp_attr(id_priv->cm_id.ib, qp_attr,
@@ -918,7 +919,7 @@ void rdma_destroy_id(struct rdma_cm_id *
        if (id_priv->cma_dev) {
                switch (rdma_node_get_transport(id_priv->id.device->node_type)) 
{
                case RDMA_TRANSPORT_IB:
-                       if (id_priv->cm_id.ib && !IS_ERR(id_priv->cm_id.ib))
+                       if (cma_has_cm_dev(id_priv))
                                ib_destroy_cm_id(id_priv->cm_id.ib);
                        break;
                case RDMA_TRANSPORT_IWARP:
@@ -1471,8 +1472,10 @@ static int cma_ib_listen(struct rdma_id_
 
        id_priv->cm_id.ib = ib_create_cm_id(id_priv->id.device, cma_req_handler,
                                            id_priv);
-       if (IS_ERR(id_priv->cm_id.ib))
-               return PTR_ERR(id_priv->cm_id.ib);
+       if (IS_ERR(id_priv->cm_id.ib)) {
+               ret = PTR_ERR(id_priv->cm_id.ib);
+               goto out;
+       }
 
        addr = (struct sockaddr *) &id_priv->id.route.addr.src_addr;
        svc_id = cma_get_service_id(id_priv->id.ps, addr);
@@ -1482,9 +1485,10 @@ static int cma_ib_listen(struct rdma_id_
                cma_set_compare_data(id_priv->id.ps, addr, &compare_data);
                ret = ib_cm_listen(id_priv->cm_id.ib, svc_id, 0, &compare_data);
        }
-
+out:
        if (ret) {
-               ib_destroy_cm_id(id_priv->cm_id.ib);
+               if (!IS_ERR(id_priv->cm_id.ib))
+                       ib_destroy_cm_id(id_priv->cm_id.ib);
                id_priv->cm_id.ib = NULL;
        }
 
@@ -2454,11 +2458,12 @@ static int cma_resolve_ib_udp(struct rdm
        req.max_cm_retries = CMA_MAX_CM_RETRIES;
 
        ret = ib_send_cm_sidr_req(id_priv->cm_id.ib, &req);
+out:
        if (ret) {
-               ib_destroy_cm_id(id_priv->cm_id.ib);
+               if (!IS_ERR(id_priv->cm_id.ib))
+                       ib_destroy_cm_id(id_priv->cm_id.ib);
                id_priv->cm_id.ib = NULL;
        }
-out:
        kfree(req.private_data);
        return ret;
 }
@@ -2516,8 +2521,9 @@ static int cma_connect_ib(struct rdma_id
 
        ret = ib_send_cm_req(id_priv->cm_id.ib, &req);
 out:
-       if (ret && !IS_ERR(id_priv->cm_id.ib)) {
-               ib_destroy_cm_id(id_priv->cm_id.ib);
+       if (ret) {
+               if (!IS_ERR(id_priv->cm_id.ib))
+                       ib_destroy_cm_id(id_priv->cm_id.ib);
                id_priv->cm_id.ib = NULL;
        }
 
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to