On Sun, Nov 13, 2011 at 12:29 PM, Dotan Barak <[email protected]> wrote: > On Sun, Nov 13, 2011 at 12:23 PM, Bart Van Assche <[email protected]> > wrote: >> Maybe the text in parentheses should be changed into a sentence on its >> own, and maybe it's a good idea to mention that when polling the same CQ >> from more than one thread that if the order in which CQE's are processed >> matters that it's the responsibility of the application to enforce that >> ordering ? > > Let's remove the text about the CQ, since i guess that as an example it adds > complications that i don't want to handle in the introduction for the > library. > > What about this: > > This library is a thread safe library and verbs can be called from every > thread in the process. The same resource can even be handled from different > threads (the atomicity of the operations is guaranteed). However, it is up > to the user to stop working with a resource after it was destroyed (by the > same thread or by any other thread), not doing so may result a segmentation > fault.
Sounds fine to me. Bart. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
