From: Or Gerlitz <[email protected]> Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2012 08:58:16 +0300
> okay, so please let me phrase that differently, would it be correct to > say that if we stick to the 1st approach of still somehow associating > the ipoib_neigh with the neighbour - no matter through what means we > do that - RCU-ing is must here. Specifically, the neighbour->priv > mechanism wouldn't get us a way from adding that protection? or maybe > it could make our life easier if we turn to use it? I would need to have to go back to the original thread and reread and reabsorb the full analysis I did back then to answer this, and I really don't have time to do that right now. You're going to have to figure out how to fix this race properly on your own or with someone else's help. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
