On Sat, 2012-05-19 at 10:50 +0000, Bart Van Assche wrote: > On 04/30/12 15:11, David Dillow wrote: > > > On Sun, 2012-04-22 at 16:01 +0000, Bart Van Assche wrote: > >> On 03/29/12 16:59, Dave Dillow wrote: > >>> I haven't chewed on the rest yet, but would like to see this one at > >>> least in 3.4 if possible. > > > >> If you have further comments about any of the patches in this series, > >> these are welcome. The 3.5 merge window isn't that far away anymore. > > > > I will attend to this before the end of the week, sooner if possible. > > > Hello Dave, > > I hope you're still doing fine ?
Yes, but I've been (mostly) under a rock for the past few weeks on higher priority projects at work. Still, that's no excuse for keeping you waiting; part of the idea was that I should have faster turn-around than Roland... This first patch was approved and should really go into the current merge window if possible. I remain convinced that we should be able to do the rest in a cleaner manner, without adding so many additional state variables. I may be wrong, though. My family is leaving Saturday for vacation, so I'll take some evening hours this weekend/early next week and see if I can combine our ideas into something I'm comfortable with. Thank you for your exceptional patience, -- Dave Dillow National Center for Computational Science Oak Ridge National Laboratory (865) 241-6602 office -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
