On 6/12/2012 10:00 AM, Roland Dreier wrote:
Jack Morgenstein<[email protected]> wrote:
several of the patches have notations indicating things that will be fixed in V1
Not sure what you want me to do with this -- it seems you yourself are saying
this series is not ready to merge yet?
Roland,
We observed few last minute issues and preferred not to further defer
submission,
with the reasons being:
1. be sure that the submitted code passed through regression, not even a
bit change since
2. the issues we spotted are all fairly simple to fix and V1 will be out
quickly
3. the design --> resulted code is a bit complex, wanted it to see the
day light such that review can start (thank you for the quick feedback
on patch 03)
All in all, V1 is coming soon, and if you prefer starting from there,
let it be, but
still, will love to get any comments / questions / corrections.
Or.
The known issues to be fixed in V1, with NNN being the patch number:
002 illegal use here of the MSB of the port_num field in the ib core ah
structure
013 add patch which will indicate some of the most-significant bits in
ib_qp_create_flags as reserved for low-level driver use.
015 modify the slave_num macro defined here to be usable in mlx4_core as
well
022 require some slight cleanup
024 require some slight cleanup
029 change the patch to reflect that RoCE is still not supported on slaves
also librdmacm will currently not support multiple VF/PF on the same host,
we will change the patch set to solve that, no change in the library
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
