> Do you have something more specific re how to actually align (say) the > RSS QP group into the framework used by XRC?
Not really. That was more of a conceptual statement regarding the design. The operation, particularly on the receive side, just seems similar. I don't think we should force a fit if it doesn't, but what's missing from the XRC framework to support RSS? I guess more specifically, if I look at the changes to ib_verbs.h, can we avoid the changes to ib_qp_init_attr and ib_qp? I.e. why can't the qp_type indicate the type of group, or why couldn't ib_open_qp() be used? Should the associated QPs share some sort of common protection domain, like an XRCD, to provide some security on sharing the underlying QP across processes? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
