If PortInfo.LocalPortNum > NodeInfo.NumPorts, then SMA is not compliant. In this case, ignore the portinfo response.
Signed-off-by: Hal Rosenstock <[email protected]> --- opensm/osm_port_info_rcv.c | 12 ++++++++++++ 1 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) diff --git a/opensm/osm_port_info_rcv.c b/opensm/osm_port_info_rcv.c index a4f81a8..d243bb2 100644 --- a/opensm/osm_port_info_rcv.c +++ b/opensm/osm_port_info_rcv.c @@ -552,6 +552,18 @@ void osm_pi_rcv_process(IN void *context, IN void *data) p_node = p_port->p_node; CL_ASSERT(p_node); + if (p_pi->local_port_num > p_node->node_info.num_ports) { + CL_PLOCK_RELEASE(sm->p_lock); + OSM_LOG(sm->p_log, OSM_LOG_ERROR, "ERR 0F09: " + "PortInfo from %s node GUID 0x%" PRIx64 + " is non-compliant and is being ignored since the " + "local port num %u > num ports %u\n", + ib_get_node_type_str(p_node->node_info.node_type), + cl_ntoh64(p_node->node_info.node_guid), + p_pi->local_port_num, p_node->node_info.num_ports); + goto Exit; + } + /* If we were setting the PortInfo, then receiving this attribute was not part of sweeping the subnet. -- 1.7.8.2 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
