On 7/13/2012 12:03 AM, Roland Dreier wrote:
steve, in case you didn't read this because of the generic subject:

Thanks Roland.  Yes, I missed this.  I'll get to this asap...

On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 7:16 PM,  <[email protected]> wrote:
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44631

            Summary: Missing NULL check of the return value of get_skb() in
                     function send_flowc()
            Product: Drivers
            Version: 2.5
     Kernel Version: 2.6.39
           Platform: All
         OS/Version: Linux
               Tree: Mainline
             Status: NEW
           Severity: normal
           Priority: P1
          Component: Infiniband/RDMA
         AssignedTo: [email protected]
         ReportedBy: [email protected]
         Regression: No


Function get_skb() may return a NULL pointer, and its return value shall be
checked before used. But in function send_flowc() after get_skb() is called(at
drivers/infiniband/hw/cxgb4/cm.c:362), the return value is immediately used as
a parameter of __skb_put() without NULL check. Besides, there is no check
before the parameter is dereferenced in the callee function __skb_put(). So an
invalid memory access may be triggered.
The related code snippets in send_flowc() are as following.
send_flowc() @@drivers/infiniband/hw/cxgb4/cm.c:362
  362        skb = get_skb(skb, flowclen, GFP_KERNEL);
  363        flowc = (struct fw_flowc_wr *)__skb_put(skb, flowclen);

And the implementation of get_skb() are as following.
get_skb() drivers/infiniband/hw/cxgb4/cm.c:301
  301static struct sk_buff *get_skb(struct sk_buff *skb, int len, gfp_t gfp)
  302{
  303        if (skb && !skb_is_nonlinear(skb) && !skb_cloned(skb)) {
  304                skb_trim(skb, 0);
  305                skb_get(skb);
  306                skb_reset_transport_header(skb);
  307        } else {
  308                skb = alloc_skb(len, gfp);
  309        }
  310        return skb;
  311}

Following is a call instance of snd_flowc.
act_establish @@drivers/infiniband/hw/cxgb4/cm.c:695
  695        /* start MPA negotiation */
  696        send_flowc(ep, NULL);

So from the source code we can see that potential NULL dereference fault exists
when path act_establish()->send_flowc()->get_skb()->alloc_skb() is executed.

Thank you

RUC_Soft_Sec

--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are watching the assignee of the bug.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to