On Sun, 22 Jul 2012, Or Gerlitz wrote: > On 7/19/2012 8:08 PM, David Miller wrote: > > These numbers come from the IPV6 Neighbour Discovery RFCs. IPV4 replicates > > the Neighbour Unreachability Detection schemes of IPV6 in pretty much it's > > entirety, and therefore takes on the same timeout et al. parameters. > > OK, got it. At this point, I guess we should enhance the patch to use the > values plugged into the IPv4 arp table at the time IPoIB is loaded, with > arp_tbl being exported its easy to achieve. This would allow users to use > non-default values by the ipoib neigh handling logic. In a later step, we need > to see if/how to allow ipoib to use the already existing sysctl entries, makes > sense?
Sounds about right. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
