On 2/20/2013 11:29 AM, Hefty, Sean wrote: >> I need to check the kernel code, but I believe that the RMPP header is >> exposed. > > I looked at copy_recv_mad(), and it copies the entire 256-byte MAD to user > space, which includes any RMPP header, followed by any additional segmented > data. So most of the RMPP definitions are relevant, the exceptions possibly > being UMAD_RMPP_TYPE_[ACK | STOP | ABORT]. IMO - I would keep those for > completeness.
Yes but how much of header is relevant when it's a multipacket RMPP MAD message ? My concern is that it may be confusing as to validity/use of certain RMPP fields, etc. -- Hal > - Sean > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
