On 3/1/2013 8:56 PM, Ira Weiny wrote: > Resend to the list. My phone apparently sends html which was rejected. > > On Fri, Mar 1, 2013 at 5:51 PM, Ira Weiny <[email protected]> wrote: >> Never mind. I was thinking the check for busy and redirect were "==" not a >> mask. >> >> Sorry many things going on today. >> >> So I think we are good then?
If this is referring to reserved values in the Code for invalid field in the status field (and not a reserved field), then yes, we're good. -- Hal >> >> Ira >> >> >> >> "Hefty, Sean" <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> If those reserve fields are either A) not correctly set to 0 or B) are >>>> used for >>>> >>>> some future status this function will fail. Since the spec says to >>>> ignore them >>>> I would do something like. >>>> >>>> status = ntohs(status); >>>> status &= 0x001F; >>>> >>>> With a #define'd mask for 1F of course... ;-) >>> >>> >>> Your proposed implementation already ignores those bits. I'm confused. >>> -- >>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in >>> the body of a message to [email protected] >>> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html >> >> >> -- >> www.lightcipher.com > > > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
