On 03/26/2013 12:46 PM, Roland Dreier wrote: >> Checkpatch recommends since some time to use sizeof(e) instead of sizeof e, >> isn't it ? > > I actually prefer "sizeof e" since sizeof is an operator, not a > function. "sizeof(e)" looks just as silly as "return(e)" to me. > > I'll apply this patch soon, it's a good catch. >
Cool, thanks!
--
Doug Ledford <dledf...@redhat.com>
GPG KeyID: 0E572FDD
http://people.redhat.com/dledford
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
