Husam,

I had to fix a couple of line wraps in your mailer (see below).  But even after 
that the patch does not apply.

13:10:37 > git am 
\[PATCH_v1\]__infiniband-diags_saquery.c__switchinfo_support_added.eml 
Applying: infiniband-diags/saquery.c: switchinfo support added
error: patch failed: src/saquery.c:481
error: src/saquery.c: patch does not apply
Patch failed at 0001 infiniband-diags/saquery.c: switchinfo support added
When you have resolved this problem run "git am --resolved".
If you would prefer to skip this patch, instead run "git am --skip".
To restore the original branch and stop patching run "git am --abort".
iweiny iqa-136 ~/dev/management/infiniband-diags
13:10:44 > patch -p 1 < 
\[PATCH_v1\]__infiniband-diags_saquery.c__switchinfo_support_added.eml 
patching file src/saquery.c
Hunk #1 FAILED at 481.
Hunk #2 FAILED at 1150.
Hunk #3 FAILED at 1342.
3 out of 3 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file src/saquery.c.rej

Could you ensure this is based on the current master branch?


On Sun, 31 Mar 2013 16:29:17 +0300
Husam Kahalah <[email protected]> wrote:

> 
> Added support to filter SwitchInfoRecords by switch LID
> 
> Signed-off-by: Husam kahalah < [email protected]>
> 
> ---
>   src/saquery.c |   55 
> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>   1 files changed, 55 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/src/saquery.c b/src/saquery.c
> index d31d77d..6390bcd 100644
> --- a/src/saquery.c
> +++ b/src/saquery.c
> @@ -481,6 +481,41 @@ static void dump_service_record(void *data)
>              cl_ntoh64(p_sr->service_data64[1]));
>   }
> 
> +static void dump_switch_info_record(void *data)
> +{
> +    ib_switch_info_record_t *p_sir = data;
> +
> +    printf("SwitchInfoRecord dump:\n"
> +           "\t\tRID\n"
> +           "\t\tlid.....................%u\n"
> +           "\t\tSwitchInfo dump:\n"
> +           "\t\tlin_cap.................0x%X\n"
> +           "\t\trand_cap................0x%X\n"
> +           "\t\tmcast_cap...............0x%X\n"
> +           "\t\tlin_top.................0x%X\n"
> +           "\t\tdef_port................%u\n"
> +           "\t\tdef_mcast_pri_port......%u\n"
> +           "\t\tdef_mcast_not_port......%u\n"
> +           "\t\tlife_state..............%u\n"
> +           "\t\tlids_per_port...........0x%X\n"
> +           "\t\tenforce_cap.............0x%X\n"
> +           "\t\tflags...................%u\n"
> +           "\t\tmcast_top...............0x%X\n",
> +           cl_ntoh16(p_sir->lid),
> +           cl_ntoh16(p_sir->switch_info.lin_cap),
> +           cl_ntoh16(p_sir->switch_info.rand_cap),
> +           cl_ntoh16(p_sir->switch_info.mcast_cap),
> +           cl_ntoh16(p_sir->switch_info.lin_top),
> +           p_sir->switch_info.def_port,
> +           p_sir->switch_info.def_mcast_pri_port,
> +           p_sir->switch_info.def_mcast_not_port,
> +           p_sir->switch_info.life_state,
> +           cl_ntoh16(p_sir->switch_info.lids_per_port),
> +           cl_ntoh16(p_sir->switch_info.enforce_cap),
> +           p_sir->switch_info.flags,
> +           cl_ntoh16(p_sir->switch_info.mcast_top));
> +}
> +
>   static void dump_inform_info_record(void *data)
>   {
>       char gid_str[INET6_ADDRSTRLEN];
> @@ -1150,6 +1185,24 @@ static int query_service_records(const struct 
> query_cmd *q, struct sa_handle * h

Line wrap here failed to apply.

>                       dump_service_record);
>   }
> 
> +static int query_switchinfo_records(const struct query_cmd *q,
> +                struct sa_handle * h, struct query_params *p,
> +                int argc, char *argv[])
> +{
> +    ib_switch_info_record_t swir;
> +    ib_net64_t comp_mask = 0;
> +    int lid = 0;
> +
> +    if (argc > 0)
> +        parse_lid_and_ports(h, argv[0], &lid, NULL, NULL);
> +
> +    memset(&swir, 0, sizeof(swir));
> +    CHECK_AND_SET_VAL(lid, 16, 0, swir.lid, SWIR, LID);
> +
> +    return get_and_dump_any_records(h, IB_SA_ATTR_SWITCHINFORECORD, 0, 
> comp_mask,

Line wrap here failed to apply.

Thanks,
Ira

> +                    &swir, sizeof(swir), dump_switch_info_record);
> +}
> +
>   static int query_inform_info_records(const struct query_cmd *q,
>                       struct sa_handle * h, struct query_params *p,
>                       int argc, char *argv[])
> @@ -1342,6 +1395,8 @@ static const struct query_cmd query_cmds[] = {
>        "[[mlid]/[position]/[block]]", query_mft_records},
>       {"GUIDInfoRecord", "GIR", IB_SA_ATTR_GUIDINFORECORD,
>        "[[lid]/[block]]", query_guidinfo_records},
> +    {"SwitchInfoRecord", "SWIR", IB_SA_ATTR_SWITCHINFORECORD,
> +     "[lid]", query_switchinfo_records},
>       {0}
>   };
> 
> -- 
> 1.7.1
> 
> 
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in
> the body of a message to [email protected]
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


-- 
Ira Weiny <[email protected]>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to