On Apr 5, 2013, at 4:40 PM, Roland Dreier <[email protected]> wrote:
> I think the idea is that without context, it's hard to know if adding > these enums makes sense or not. And I'm sorry but I'm not that > sympathetic to "my code isn't ready but you have to take this > out-of-context patch so I can meet Red Hat's arbitrary schedule." Ok, fair enough. It'll be a few weeks before we can submit usnic.ko, so I'll re-bring up the IBV_NODE_VENDOR/related patches then. I think the MTU discussion is still relevant, however -- there seems to be a larger design issue there. I'll go reply separately on that thread. -- Jeff Squyres [email protected] For corporate legal information go to: http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/ -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
