On Apr 18, 2013, at 6:03 PM, Atchley, Scott wrote:
> On Apr 18, 2013, at 3:15 PM, Wendy Cheng <[email protected]> wrote: > >> On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 10:50 AM, Spencer Shepler >> <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> Note that SPEC SFS does not support RDMA. >>> >> >> IIRC, the benchmark comes with source code - wondering anyone has >> modified it to run on RDMA ? Or is there any real user to share the >> experience ? > > I am not familiar with SpecSFS, but if it exercises the filesystem, it does > not know which RPC layer that NFS uses, no? Or does it implement its own > client and directly access the RPC layer? Yes, the SPEC SFS benchmark implements its own NFSv3 client, RPC layer, etc. Spencer > >> >> -- Wendy >> >>> ________________________________ >>> From: Wendy Cheng >>> Sent: 4/18/2013 9:16 AM >>> To: Yan Burman >>> Cc: Atchley, Scott; J. Bruce Fields; Tom Tucker; [email protected]; >>> [email protected]; Or Gerlitz >>> >>> Subject: Re: NFS over RDMA benchmark >>> >>> On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 5:47 AM, Yan Burman <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> What do you suggest for benchmarking NFS? >>>> >>> >>> I believe SPECsfs has been widely used by NFS (server) vendors to >>> position their product lines. Its workload was based on a real life >>> NFS deployment. I think it is more torward office type of workload >>> (large client/user count with smaller file sizes e.g. software >>> development with build, compile, etc). >>> >>> BTW, we're experimenting a similar project and would be interested to >>> know your findings. >>> >>> -- Wendy >>> -- >>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in >>> >>> the body of a message to [email protected] >>> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
