On Apr 12, 2013, at 11:40 AM, Jeff Squyres (jsquyres) <jsquy...@cisco.com>
wrote:
>> As an aside I like the use of RDMA_MTU_* for these values. Again to
>> distinguish them from the IBTA values. But I know that is poor form.
>
> So what's the right way to move forward on this? Is it this:
>
> enum ib_mtu {
> IB_MTU_256 = 1,
> IB_MTU_512 = 2,
> IB_MTU_1024 = 3,
> IB_MTU_2048 = 4,
> IB_MTU_4096 = 5,
> RDMA_MTU_1500 = 1500,
> RDMA_MTU_9000 = 9000
> };
Bump.
--
Jeff Squyres
jsquy...@cisco.com
For corporate legal information go to:
http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
