On 6/4/2013 2:46 PM, Hefty, Sean wrote:
+
#ifdef HAVE_IBV_REGISTER_DRIVER
static __attribute__((constructor)) void mlx4_register_driver(void)
{
- ibv_register_driver("mlx4", mlx4_driver_init);
+ verbs_register_driver("mlx4", mlx4_driver_init);
+
}
#else
Shouldn't ibv_register_driver() need to be called in the lib constructor
function if HAVE_IBV_REGISTER_DRIVER is not defined?
? If HAVE_IBV_REGISTER_DRIVER is not defined, then we can't call
ibv_register_driver...
I thought HAVE_IBV_REGISTER_DRIVER was something new for deciding if the
lib should call verbs_register_driver().
We should just remove the HAVE_IBV_... check completely, since with this
change, libmlx4 requires an updated version of libibverbs.
Ah. I was thinking it would use the old interface if it was compiled
against a libibverbs that didn't support the extensions.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
