On Jun 5, 2013, at 9:46 AM, Jason Gunthorpe <[email protected]> 
wrote:

> No, this too big of an ABI break, and silent at that..
> 
> The IBA values have to continue to be accepted and exported in all
> cases so the ABI stays the same, which is what I thought was agreed
> on??


Can this go to a libibverbs 2.0, where it would be palatable to have an ABI 
break?

-- 
Jeff Squyres
[email protected]
For corporate legal information go to: 
http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to