On Tue, 2013-07-02 at 13:18 -0600, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 01, 2013 at 07:26:05AM -0400, David Dillow wrote:
> > You assume independent failures, which is suspect -- many times these
> > are data-dependent, or so I tend to think. Jason, do you have any
> > insight on this (overall) topic you could share?
> 
> All data transmitted on modern serial links is 'whitened'
> somehow. This is does independently on a link-by-link basis either
> with 8b/10b coding or with the 64b/66b scrambler. So the idea of a
> high level 'magic packet' that causes data-dependent errors is not
> statistically likely.

My thought was that if we hit a statistically unlikely pattern that
caused an issue, the retransmission is likely to also hit the issue
given the deterministic scrambling. But I didn't think about the fact
that the signal stream was being whitened.

> It is best to use all the information the SM provides when setting up
> the path, however I don't think there is a best practice idea yet for
> how to setup the retry count though..

Hmm, that would be a useful presentation for the workshop; I'll have to
see if I can get some people interested here.

Thanks for the information,
Dave
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to