On 07/16/2013 08:16 PM, Roland Dreier wrote: > On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 10:11 AM, Jeff Squyres (jsquyres) > <[email protected]> wrote: >> - doing it this way preserves ABI, so existing binaries are safe > > I still don't get this. Wouldn't an existing binary be pretty > surprised to get a value wildly out of range of the enum?
Yes, but there's no way around that without simply lying about the MTU. So, the argument was made in the thread that historically, applications have had to be modified when moved to a new link layer (aka, iWARP meant IB apps had to be slightly modified for connection reasons, RoCE again required some slight app modifications, etc) so this was seen as a case of "the app will work on fabrics it already knows about, and will only get confused if moved to this new fabric, and in that case, the app needs to be modified anyway, so that's acceptable breakage for keeping the apps working the rest of the time". That was the argument anyway. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
