Hi Sasha, On 7/22/2013 11:40 AM, Sasha Khapyorsky wrote: > Hi Hal, > > On 09:37 Fri 12 Jul , Hal Rosenstock wrote: >> >> What difference does it make ? Does this patch fix some operational >> issue ? Is there any harm in not keeping the complete PortInfo when port >> is DOWN ? > > AFAIK it doesn't harm in the current state. However, I'm prepering the > patches, which will let to OpenSM work on stand alone port. For such > mode this fix is critical.
Why is it critical for this set of patches ? I'm still missing why that's required for supporting single port sweep (so loopback connections still work). What PortInfo fields are really needed ? -- Hal > Will recent with other patches shortly. > > Sasha > . > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
