On Tue, 2013-09-10 at 19:44 +0200, Bart Van Assche wrote: > If this name was not yet in use in any interface that is visible in user > space, I would agree that we should come up with a better name. However, > the SCSI mid-layer already uses that name today to export the queue > size. To me this looks like a good reason to use the name "can_queue" ? > An example: > > $ cat /sys/class/scsi_host/host93/can_queue > 62
Yes, I know it has been used before, but I'm torn between not furthering a bad naming choice and consistency. Foolish consistency and all that... I really don't like "can_queue", but I'll not complain if Roland decides to take it as-is. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
