Le 09.10.2013 13:38, Or Gerlitz a écrit :
On 07/10/2013 23:49, Yann Droneaud wrote:
Commit 400dbc9 added an infrastructure for extensible uverbs
commands while later commit 436f2ad exported
ib_create_flow()/ib_destroy_flow()
functions using this new infrastructure.
According to the commit 400dbc9, the purpose of this infrastructure is
to support passing around provider (eg. hardware) specific buffers
when userspace issue commands to the kernel, so that it would be
possible
to extend uverbs (eg. core) buffers independently from the provider
buffers.
But the new kernel command function prototypes were not modified
to take advantage of this extension. This issue was exposed by
Roland Dreier in:
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 for-next 2/4] IB/core: Infra-structure to
support verbs extensions through uverbs
Date: 2013-06-26 13:05:16 GMT
Message-Id:<CAL1RGDWxmM17W2o_era24A-TTDeKyoL6u3NRu_=t_dhv_za...@mail.gmail.com>
So the following patch is an attempt to a revised extensible command
infrastructure.
Yan, repeating my request, could you please remove all references to
email threads from the change-logs of your series and resend it.
I've removed all the other related to the previous submissions of the
patch.
FWIW you can leave them in the section below the --- line so git am
will not pick them.
I'm gonna add the reference to Roland's remarks as a Link: tag. Is is OK
this way ?
Regards.
--
Yann Droneaud
OPTEYA
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
