On 02/27/2014 05:13 AM, Sagi Grimberg wrote:
> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/libiscsi.c b/drivers/scsi/libiscsi.c
> index 4046241..a58a6bb 100644
> --- a/drivers/scsi/libiscsi.c
> +++ b/drivers/scsi/libiscsi.c
> @@ -395,6 +395,10 @@ static int iscsi_prep_scsi_cmd_pdu(struct iscsi_task
> *task)
> if (rc)
> return rc;
> }
> +
> + if (scsi_get_prot_op(sc) != SCSI_PROT_NORMAL)
> + task->protected = true;
> +
> if (sc->sc_data_direction == DMA_TO_DEVICE) {
> unsigned out_len = scsi_out(sc)->length;
> struct iscsi_r2t_info *r2t = &task->unsol_r2t;
> @@ -823,6 +827,33 @@ static void iscsi_scsi_cmd_rsp(struct iscsi_conn *conn,
> struct iscsi_hdr *hdr,
>
> sc->result = (DID_OK << 16) | rhdr->cmd_status;
>
> + if (task->protected) {
> + sector_t sector;
> + u8 ascq;
> +
> + /**
> + * Transports that didn't implement check_protection
> + * callback but still published T10-PI support to scsi-mid
> + * deserve this BUG_ON.
> + **/
> + BUG_ON(!session->tt->check_protection);
Extra space before BUG_ON.
> +
> + ascq = session->tt->check_protection(task, §or);
> + if (ascq) {
> + sc->result = DRIVER_SENSE << 24 | DID_ABORT << 16 |
> + SAM_STAT_CHECK_CONDITION;
I am not sure what the reason for the DID_ABORT is here. I do not think
we want that, because we just want scsi-ml to evaluate the sense error
part of the failure. It works ok today, but the DID_ABORT error can
possibly be evaluated before the sense so you might miss passing that
info to upper layers.
> + scsi_build_sense_buffer(1, sc->sense_buffer,
> + ILLEGAL_REQUEST, 0x10, ascq);
> + sc->sense_buffer[7] = 0xc; /* Additional sense length */
> + sc->sense_buffer[8] = 0; /* Information desc type */
> + sc->sense_buffer[9] = 0xa; /* Additional desc length */
> + sc->sense_buffer[10] = 0x80; /* Validity bit */
> +
> + put_unaligned_be64(sector, &sc->sense_buffer[12]);
> + goto out;
> + }
> + }
> +
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
