Sean,

I was out of work so I tested the patch "librdmacm: lazy initialization
for ib devices" today. The patch works fine for my test case. The only
concern I have is that I think the patch might leak verbs context. I
think that any call to ucma_init_device must be done with mutex locked.
Please correct me if I am wrong.

Thanks, Shamir


Signed-off-by: shamir rabinovitch <[email protected]>
---
 src/cma.c |    7 +++++--
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/cma.c b/src/cma.c
index 0dc229e..42769cf 100644
--- a/src/cma.c
+++ b/src/cma.c
@@ -416,10 +416,13 @@ static int ucma_get_device(struct cma_id_private 
*id_priv, uint64_t guid)
 
        return ERR(ENODEV);
 match:
-       if ((ret = ucma_init_device(cma_dev)))
+       pthread_mutex_lock(&mut);
+
+       if ((ret = ucma_init_device(cma_dev))) {
+               pthread_mutex_unlock(&mut);
                return ret;
+       }
 
-       pthread_mutex_lock(&mut);
        if (!cma_dev->refcnt++) {
                cma_dev->pd = ibv_alloc_pd(cma_dev->verbs);
                if (!cma_dev->pd) {
-- 
1.7.9.5

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to