On Wed, May 07, 2014 at 02:39:26PM +0000, Weiny, Ira wrote:
> > On Mon, May 05, 2014 at 09:44:49PM -0400, [email protected] wrote:
> > 
> > > +struct ib_user_mad_reg_req2 {
> > > + __u32   id;
> > > + __u32   qpn;
> > > + __u8    mgmt_class;
> > > + __u8    mgmt_class_version;
> > > + __u16   res;
> > > + __u32   flags;
> > > + __u64   method_mask[2];
> > > + __u8    oui[3]; /* network order */
> > > + __u8    rmpp_version;
> > > +};
> > 
> > Please make the padding on 64 bit explicit so we don't have weird problems
> > mixing 32 and 64 bit code.
> 
> Just to be clear you mean to add a __u32 reserved field to the end of this 
> struct?

I think that is enough, yes. Yann has been using pahole to investigate
these issues.


> > Similar comment as for userspace using a host order uint for the oui.
> 
> Ok would you prefer changing this to __u32 and specifying in host order?  
> Then adjust the padding, like this:
> 
> __u32 oui;
> _u8 rmpp_version;
> _u8 res[3];
> 
> To complete the changes?

s/res/reserved/

Sure, that seems simpler for all involved. 

Jason
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to