> I didn't follow this. If rsocket is behaving differently than normal > sockets, I'm fine updating it so that it matches the desired behavior. It > doesn't need to be an option. > > That said, can you provide more details on what the desired behavior > should be and what rsockets is doing differently?
I did a quick test, and I *think* the difference that you're referring to is this: Normal sockets: listen(sX) -> returns success listen(sX) -> returns success rsockets rlisten(rsY) -> returns success rlisten(rsY) -> fails Can you confirm that this is the problem you want to address? If so, then I think a fix to rsockets is needed, rather than trapping this in the preload library. - Sean -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
