On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 5:02 AM, Yishai Hadas <[email protected]> wrote:
> The API defined for Peer-Direct is described in this cover letter.
> The required implementation for a hardware device to expose memory
> buffers over Peer-Direct is also detailed in this letter.

I don't see how I can justify merging this (for now at least), given
that there are no actual users of all this (fairly complex) new code,
besides a sample that doesn't actually do anything useful.  Is there
any actual consumer that might go upstream someday that we can at
least review now?

> This makes the usage of peer-direct almost completely transparent to
> the individual hardware drivers. The only changes required in the low
> level IB hardware drivers is supporting an interface for immediate
> invalidation of registered memory regions.

Why do we need immediate invalidation of memory regions?

 - R.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to