On 2/11/2015 10:40 AM, Weiny, Ira wrote:
>> On 2/4/2015 6:29 PM, [email protected] wrote:
>>> From: Ira Weiny <[email protected]>
>>>
>>> OPA MADs share a common header with IBTA MADs but with a different
>>> base version and an extended length.  These "jumbo" MADs increase the
>>> performance of management traffic.
>>>
>>> Sharing a common header with IBTA MADs allows us to share most of the
>>> MAD processing code when dealing with OPA MADs in addition to
>>> supporting some IBTA MADs on OPA devices.
>>>
>>> Add a device capability flag to indicate OPA MAD support on the device.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Ira Weiny <[email protected]>
>>>
>>> ---
>>>  include/rdma/ib_verbs.h | 5 +++++
>>>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/include/rdma/ib_verbs.h b/include/rdma/ib_verbs.h index
>>> 3ab4033..2614233 100644
>>> --- a/include/rdma/ib_verbs.h
>>> +++ b/include/rdma/ib_verbs.h
>>> @@ -128,6 +128,10 @@ enum ib_device_cap_flags {
>>>     IB_DEVICE_ON_DEMAND_PAGING      = (1<<31),
>>>  };
>>>
>>> +enum ib_device_cap_flags2 {
>>> +   IB_DEVICE_OPA_MAD_SUPPORT       = 1
>>> +};
>>> +
>>>  enum ib_signature_prot_cap {
>>>     IB_PROT_T10DIF_TYPE_1 = 1,
>>>     IB_PROT_T10DIF_TYPE_2 = 1 << 1,
>>> @@ -210,6 +214,7 @@ struct ib_device_attr {
>>>     int                     sig_prot_cap;
>>>     int                     sig_guard_cap;
>>>     struct ib_odp_caps      odp_caps;
>>> +   u64                     device_cap_flags2;
>>>     u32                     max_mad_size;
>>>  };
>>>
>>
>> Why is OPA support determined via a device capability flag ? What are the
>> tradeoffs for doing it this way versus the other choices that have been used 
>> in
>> the past for other RDMA technologies like RoCE, iWARP, usNIC, ... ?
> 
> None of those technologies use the MAD stack for Subnet Management.  Other 
> MAD support is very limited (ie IB compatible PMA queries on the local port 
> only).
> 
> Do you have a suggestion for alternatives?

The desire to leverage the IB MAD infrastructure for OPA is understood
but the current approach represents OPA as a device capability which
does not seem appropriate because OPA is clearly a different type of
RDMA technology than IB.

-- Hal

> Ira
> 
> 

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to