On Mon, Apr 13, 2015 at 7:10 PM, Hefty, Sean <[email protected]> wrote: >> Unfortunately, Sean -- you haven't provided for > 2 months any >> feedback on the patches to the CM/CMA modules which you own/maintain >> for supporting name-spaces and such which are part of enabling proper >> RDMA support for containers. >> http://marc.info/?l=linux-netdev&m=142366747608908&w=2 This makes your >> co-maintainer position sort of problematic, BTW. Jason, any chance you >> can look on that?
> Linux does not pull anything from me directly. My own patches to the code > that I supposedly maintain take *years* to get upstream. I fail to see how > or why I need to review patches from a hostile party. Sure, I know that Linus doesn't pull directly from you and also that being a co-maintainer didn't help for when it took Roland 2-3 years to pick your AF_IB patch series. However, fact is that you are the author and maintainer of the CM and RDMA_CM and over the years Roland didn't pick patches to these components prior to your review and ack. > two months ago we sent patch series which serves to add RDMA support to > containers and modify these two drivers, and not a word from you. This is > what missing. In the past it took you two hours to provide excellent > feedback, now something is broken out. Sean, please speak up and explain who is hostile and why you think so, BTW is that a personal comment? Or. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
