On 4/29/2015 7:28 PM, Doug Ledford wrote:
On Tue, 2015-04-28 at 17:10 +0200, Michael Wang wrote:
>Since v6:
>   * Thanks to Ira, Devesh for the review and testing:-)
>   * Thanks for the comments from Sean, Tom, Jason, Doug, Devesh, Ira,
>     Liran:-)  Please remind me if anything missed:-P
>   * Use query_protocol() and enum protocol type in 1#
>   * Use rdma_protocol_XX() in 2#
>   * Drop cma_set_legacy_transport()
>   * Reserve rdma_ib_or_iboe() and rdma_node_get_transport()
>   * Updated github repository to v7
I've taken your patchset and threw it into a for-4.2 branch in my repo.
This will get it 0day testing.  I've also pulled it into my test cluster
and done minimal testing (bootup, finds devices, gets IP address via dhcp).

Doug,

As I wrote to Michael, this series carries way (way) over Cc: pointers in each it's commits. We have never had something like this since this stack was formed 10y ago and accepted into 2.6.12 --- and I didn't hear any good reason for why doing so (see the thread for "[PATCH v7 04/23] IB/Verbs: Reform IB-core cm") -- can you please provide your opinion on the matter?

Or.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to