The switches are unmanaged. Is it possible to ensure in-order packets with managed switches?
Jesus On Wed, May 27, 2015 at 4:30 PM, Hal Rosenstock <[email protected]> wrote: > On 5/27/2015 10:16 AM, Jesus Camacho Villanueva wrote: >> Hi Hal, >> >> Thanks for your quick response :) >> >> What you say here makes sense. I have seen this behaviour in one of >> the switches, but I don't discard that this problem can arise in other >> switches. > > Note that for MADs, transaction ID is "looser" than traditional > transaction ID semantics in that "the combination of TID, SGID, and > MgmtClass is different from that of any currently executing operation" > and does not imply ordering. If there is ordering required, it is the > responsibility of the manager to enforce that. > >> The switch is: Infiniscale-IV Mellanox Technologies 4xQDR > > Is it a managed or unmanaged switch ? > > -- Hal -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
