> From: Hal Rosenstock [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Thursday, June 11, 2015 8:24 AM
> To: Weiny, Ira
> Cc: Jason Gunthorpe; Wan, Kaike; [email protected]; Fleck, John
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 4/4] IB/sa: Route SA pathrecord query through netlink
> 
> On 6/10/2015 5:09 PM, Weiny, Ira wrote:
> >> On 6/10/2015 3:10 PM, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> >>> On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 01:47:36PM -0400, Hal Rosenstock wrote:
> >>>> On 6/9/2015 10:57 AM, [email protected] wrote:
> >>>>> From: Kaike Wan <[email protected]>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> This patch routes a SA pathrecord query to netlink first
> >>>>
> >>>> Should only unicast PRs be done in this manner or should API
> >>>> support enabling for unicast and/or multicast ?
> >>>>
> >>>> AFAIK kernel doesn't query multicast PRs now (queries MCMRs) but
> >>>> this seems like it would help make it future proof and not have to
> >>>> take timeout on local query unless app supports it.
> >>>
> >>> It is a good question. We can clearly extend toward that, using a
> >>> MGID as the DGID and adding additional nested netlink fields.
> >>>
> >>> However, does it make sense?
> >>
> >> If it doesn't make sense, then should MGIDs as DGIDs never be
> >> requested via the PR netlink API ?
> >>
> >
> > Why should we prevent it?  What does it hurt?
> 
> It's merely an optimization in that round trip to user space is avoided with
> user space needing to perform some validation/lookup which would fail in
> case multicast PRs not supported (which is case for ACM with multicast
> backend).

If the kernel client can query SA for mulitcast PRs, why can't ibacm (even 
backed by acmp)? Is there any code there that prevents a mgid being used as the 
destination?

> 
> If user space PR capabilities (unicast, multicast, both) is supported, it 
> affects
> the API. 
How? If we can query SA for multicast PRs without joining the multicast groups, 
what additional changes in netlink API do we need to support both?

>Maybe it's overkill but requires user space to indicate no PR available
> for multicast DGIDs. I think this is the tradeoff to be made/decided.
> 

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to