> -----Original Message-----
> From: Tom Talpey [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Tuesday, July 21, 2015 3:47 PM
> To: Steve Wise; 'Jason Gunthorpe'
> Cc: 'Chuck Lever'; [email protected]; [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 05/15] xprtrdma: Remove last ib_reg_phys_mr() call site
> 
> On 7/21/2015 7:33 AM, Steve Wise wrote:
> >
> >
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: [email protected] 
> >> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Tom Talpey
> >> Sent: Monday, July 20, 2015 7:15 PM
> >> To: Steve Wise; 'Jason Gunthorpe'
> >> Cc: 'Chuck Lever'; [email protected]; [email protected]
> >> Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 05/15] xprtrdma: Remove last ib_reg_phys_mr() call 
> >> site
> >>
> >> On 7/20/2015 3:41 PM, Steve Wise wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>> -----Original Message-----
> >>>> From: Tom Talpey [mailto:[email protected]]
> >>>> Sent: Monday, July 20, 2015 5:04 PM
> >>>> To: Steve Wise; 'Jason Gunthorpe'
> >>>> Cc: 'Chuck Lever'; [email protected]; [email protected]
> >>>> Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 05/15] xprtrdma: Remove last ib_reg_phys_mr() 
> >>>> call site
> >>>>
> >>>> On 7/20/2015 2:16 PM, Steve Wise wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> -----Original Message-----
> >>>>>> From: [email protected] 
> >>>>>> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Jason Gunthorpe
> >>>>>> Sent: Monday, July 20, 2015 4:06 PM
> >>>>>> To: Tom Talpey; Steve Wise
> >>>>>> Cc: Chuck Lever; [email protected]; [email protected]
> >>>>>> Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 05/15] xprtrdma: Remove last ib_reg_phys_mr() 
> >>>>>> call site
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> On Mon, Jul 20, 2015 at 01:34:16PM -0700, Tom Talpey wrote:
> >>>>>>> On 7/20/2015 12:03 PM, Chuck Lever wrote:
> >>>>>>>> All HCA providers have an ib_get_dma_mr() verb. Thus
> >>>>>>>> rpcrdma_ia_open() will either grab the device's local_dma_key if one
> >>>>>>>> is available, or it will call ib_get_dma_mr() which is a 100%
> >>>>>>>> guaranteed fallback.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> I recall that in the past, some providers did not support mapping
> >>>>>>> all of the machine's potential physical memory with a single dma_mr.
> >>>>>>> If an rnic did/does not support 44-ish bits of length per region,
> >>>>>>> for example.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Looks like you are right, but the standard in kernel is to require
> >>>>>> ib_get_dma_mr, if the HCA can't do that, then it cannot be used on a
> >>>>>> big memory machine with kernel ULPs.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Looking deeper, both amso1100 and cxgb3 seem limited to 32 bits of
> >>>>>> physical memory, and silently break all kernel ULPs if they are used
> >>>>>> on a modern machine with > 4G.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Is that right Steve?
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Yes.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> Based on that, should we remove the cxgb3 driver as well? Or at least
> >>>>>> can you fix it up to at least fail get_dma_mr if there is too much
> >>>>>> ram?
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> I would like to keep cxgb3 around.  I can add code to fail if the 
> >>>>> memory is > 32b.  Do you know how I get the amount of
> >>> available
> >>>>> ram?
> >>>>
> >>>> A) are you sure it's an unsigned length, i.e. is it really 31 bits?
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>> yes.
> >>>
> >>>> B) why bother to check? Are machines with <4GB interesting, and worth
> >>>> supporting a special optimization?
> >>>
> >>> No, but cxgb3 is still interesting to user applications, and perhaps 
> >>> NFSRDMA using FRMRs.
> >>
> >> I'm obviously not making myself clear. I am suggesting that cxgb3 fail
> >> the ib_get_dma_mr() verb, regardless of installed memory.
> >>
> >> I am not suggesting it fail to load, or fail other memreg requests. It
> >> should work normally in all other respects.
> >
> > Even with its limitation, doesn't it have utility for someone using cxgb3 
> > in an embedded 32b environment?
> 
> Sure, do you mean making it conditional on #if sizeof(physaddr) <= 32?
> That would make sense I guess.

No, a runtime check.  x64 platforms will work too if the mem size takes <= 32b 
to describe. 


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to