On 17/11/2015 12:14, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
On Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 11:50:15AM +0200, Sagi Grimberg wrote:


On 17/11/2015 10:09, Or Gerlitz wrote:
On 11/16/2015 6:37 PM, Sagi Grimberg wrote:
We'll use remote invalidate, according to negotiation result
during connection establishment. If the initiator declared that
it supports the remote invalidate exception then the target will
use IB_WR_SEND_WITH_INV with the correct rkey for the response.

same comment as the one I posted for the initiator patch, check for
IB_DEVICE_MEM_MGT_EXTENSIONS

SEND_WITH_INV doesn't have anything to do with
IB_DEVICE_MEM_MGT_EXTENSIONS does it? What is the relations between
the device capability to do FRWR and invalidating a remote rkey?

Both FRs and SEND_WITH_INV are part of the base memory management
extensions and also required for iWarp.

Thanks for clarifying. I'll add the check.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to