On 25/11/2015 21:28, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 09:09:20AM -0800, santosh shilimkar wrote:
I'd say drop the current iWarp transport if it's not testable. The
only real difference between IB and iWarp is the needed to create
a MR for the RDMA READ sink, and we're much better of adding that into
the current IB transport if new iWarp users show up.
Agree. I will probably do it along with RDS IB FR support in 4.6
Great news!
Great news indeed!
Looking forward to seeing this.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
